<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: email, e-mail, Email, 还是E-mail?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.angryeditor.com/2009/11/12/email-e-mail-email-%e8%bf%98%e6%98%afe-mail/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.angryeditor.com/2009/11/12/email-e-mail-email-%e8%bf%98%e6%98%afe-mail/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 14:55:08 +0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: a new one</title>
		<link>http://www.angryeditor.com/2009/11/12/email-e-mail-email-%e8%bf%98%e6%98%afe-mail/comment-page-1/#comment-309</link>
		<dc:creator>a new one</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 16:18:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.angryeditor.com/?p=179#comment-309</guid>
		<description>这个网站用的是E-Mail (required) (will not be published). 我更倾向于email,它更像是一个词汇.E-business (电子商务)更强调的是电子化,所以分开写比较合适.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>这个网站用的是E-Mail (required) (will not be published). 我更倾向于email,它更像是一个词汇.E-business (电子商务)更强调的是电子化,所以分开写比较合适.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eva</title>
		<link>http://www.angryeditor.com/2009/11/12/email-e-mail-email-%e8%bf%98%e6%98%afe-mail/comment-page-1/#comment-177</link>
		<dc:creator>Eva</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 02:17:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.angryeditor.com/?p=179#comment-177</guid>
		<description>大部分中国人对一些英文表达不知道由来，也没有意识关注这样的细节。看到大多数场合是怎么样的，也就跟着怎么样用了。
我一向希望能做到严谨的语言表达，但很多时候还是知识不够。你这里的内容很有帮助。谢谢（我信任你哦～）</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>大部分中国人对一些英文表达不知道由来，也没有意识关注这样的细节。看到大多数场合是怎么样的，也就跟着怎么样用了。<br />
我一向希望能做到严谨的语言表达，但很多时候还是知识不够。你这里的内容很有帮助。谢谢（我信任你哦～）</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lehman</title>
		<link>http://www.angryeditor.com/2009/11/12/email-e-mail-email-%e8%bf%98%e6%98%afe-mail/comment-page-1/#comment-155</link>
		<dc:creator>lehman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 09:27:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.angryeditor.com/?p=179#comment-155</guid>
		<description>在office outlook里是E-mail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>在office outlook里是E-mail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zheng Yue</title>
		<link>http://www.angryeditor.com/2009/11/12/email-e-mail-email-%e8%bf%98%e6%98%afe-mail/comment-page-1/#comment-147</link>
		<dc:creator>Zheng Yue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 11:04:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.angryeditor.com/?p=179#comment-147</guid>
		<description>In AP Style Book, e-mail is correct. Not sure how Chicago Style Book or NYTimes Style book.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In AP Style Book, e-mail is correct. Not sure how Chicago Style Book or NYTimes Style book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.angryeditor.com/2009/11/12/email-e-mail-email-%e8%bf%98%e6%98%afe-mail/comment-page-1/#comment-125</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 05:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.angryeditor.com/?p=179#comment-125</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;#commentbody-118&quot;&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-118&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Angry Editor&lt;/a&gt; :&lt;/strong&gt;I am not aware of any US/British split on this one. I think such a disagreement would be less likely with a word used globally in the last couple of decades. What do you think?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I think the hyphen better emphasizes the &quot;electronic&quot; part.  I think &quot;email&quot; seems a little lazy. I mean, what the heck are hyphens for if people don&#039;t use them. For example, merry-go-round and editor-in-chief would be merrygoround and editorinchief, hard to read....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="#commentbody-118"><p>
<strong><a href="#comment-118" rel="nofollow">Angry Editor</a> :</strong>I am not aware of any US/British split on this one. I think such a disagreement would be less likely with a word used globally in the last couple of decades. What do you think?</p></blockquote>
<p>I think the hyphen better emphasizes the &#8220;electronic&#8221; part.  I think &#8220;email&#8221; seems a little lazy. I mean, what the heck are hyphens for if people don&#8217;t use them. For example, merry-go-round and editor-in-chief would be merrygoround and editorinchief, hard to read&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vivian</title>
		<link>http://www.angryeditor.com/2009/11/12/email-e-mail-email-%e8%bf%98%e6%98%afe-mail/comment-page-1/#comment-123</link>
		<dc:creator>vivian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 14:44:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.angryeditor.com/?p=179#comment-123</guid>
		<description>你很细心，加油！</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>你很细心，加油！</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vivian</title>
		<link>http://www.angryeditor.com/2009/11/12/email-e-mail-email-%e8%bf%98%e6%98%afe-mail/comment-page-1/#comment-122</link>
		<dc:creator>vivian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 14:41:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.angryeditor.com/?p=179#comment-122</guid>
		<description>let&#039;s see google results:
email-2,230,000,000 
e-mail-1,150,000,000 

and another resource-Wikipedia
Electronic mail, often abbreviated as email, e.mail or e-mail, is a method of exchanging digital messages, designed primarily for human use.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E-mail

Actually, I dont think it&#039;s a serious problem, I think both are fine-email or e-mail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>let&#8217;s see google results:<br />
email-2,230,000,000<br />
e-mail-1,150,000,000 </p>
<p>and another resource-Wikipedia<br />
Electronic mail, often abbreviated as email, e.mail or e-mail, is a method of exchanging digital messages, designed primarily for human use.<br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E-mail" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E-mail</a></p>
<p>Actually, I dont think it&#8217;s a serious problem, I think both are fine-email or e-mail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angry Editor</title>
		<link>http://www.angryeditor.com/2009/11/12/email-e-mail-email-%e8%bf%98%e6%98%afe-mail/comment-page-1/#comment-118</link>
		<dc:creator>Angry Editor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 12:35:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.angryeditor.com/?p=179#comment-118</guid>
		<description>I am not aware of any US/British split on this one. I think such a disagreement would be less likely with a word used globally in the last couple of decades. What do you think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not aware of any US/British split on this one. I think such a disagreement would be less likely with a word used globally in the last couple of decades. What do you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.angryeditor.com/2009/11/12/email-e-mail-email-%e8%bf%98%e6%98%afe-mail/comment-page-1/#comment-116</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 04:33:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.angryeditor.com/?p=179#comment-116</guid>
		<description>在英国和美国,e-mail这个词，有一样的用法吗？我在美国一直看e-mail,这样....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>在英国和美国,e-mail这个词，有一样的用法吗？我在美国一直看e-mail,这样&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hare98</title>
		<link>http://www.angryeditor.com/2009/11/12/email-e-mail-email-%e8%bf%98%e6%98%afe-mail/comment-page-1/#comment-112</link>
		<dc:creator>hare98</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 10:53:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.angryeditor.com/?p=179#comment-112</guid>
		<description>你这个问题挺有意思，值得讨论。我也觉得那个e不应该大写，虽然它是电子的首字母，但单个字母表示一个词时大写很难看，挺丑。我也认为写成e-mail或email这样比较好</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>你这个问题挺有意思，值得讨论。我也觉得那个e不应该大写，虽然它是电子的首字母，但单个字母表示一个词时大写很难看，挺丑。我也认为写成e-mail或email这样比较好</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
