<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: “Including”和“etc.”为什么不应该一起用呢？</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.angryeditor.com/2009/12/15/including/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.angryeditor.com/2009/12/15/including/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 06:07:30 +0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Angry Editor</title>
		<link>http://www.angryeditor.com/2009/12/15/including/comment-page-1/#comment-233</link>
		<dc:creator>Angry Editor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 15:21:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.angryeditor.com/?p=262#comment-233</guid>
		<description>Excellent thoughts... when I have more time I am going to rewrite this post and input everyone&#039;s suggestions! Thank you all so much!

”including red, black and white – 就只包含三种颜色“

我自己觉得在这里“including”指的是除了这三种颜色以外还包含其他的颜色。不过，有些英语专家不这么觉得。他们觉得including也可以表示就只包含三种颜色。不过，因为这个矛盾问题存在，所以为了避免这种“含糊”，可以换一个词 － ”consisting&quot;。

比如说：consisting of red, black and white – 就只包含三种颜色</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent thoughts&#8230; when I have more time I am going to rewrite this post and input everyone&#8217;s suggestions! Thank you all so much!</p>
<p>”including red, black and white – 就只包含三种颜色“</p>
<p>我自己觉得在这里“including”指的是除了这三种颜色以外还包含其他的颜色。不过，有些英语专家不这么觉得。他们觉得including也可以表示就只包含三种颜色。不过，因为这个矛盾问题存在，所以为了避免这种“含糊”，可以换一个词 － ”consisting&#8221;。</p>
<p>比如说：consisting of red, black and white – 就只包含三种颜色</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle Zhang</title>
		<link>http://www.angryeditor.com/2009/12/15/including/comment-page-1/#comment-228</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle Zhang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 08:11:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.angryeditor.com/?p=262#comment-228</guid>
		<description>In Chinese, &quot;等&quot; is also used as an &quot;indicator&quot;, denoting that the previous things/people are listed, and in this case the character“等”does not actually carry the meaning that there&#039;s more to be listed. 
see examples as follows:

(3) 列举后煞尾 [etc.]

如：与樊哙夏候婴靳强纪信等四人持剑盾步走《史记·项羽本纪》
又如:长江、黄河、黑龙江、珠江等四大河流
..... see http://www.zdic.net/zd/

So, I believe a Chinese author may use a sentence like: &quot;包括a、b、c、d等&quot;， and if a translator is unfamiliar with the above usage I quoted, he/she may directly translate it into &quot;including a, b, c, d, etc.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Chinese, &#8220;等&#8221; is also used as an &#8220;indicator&#8221;, denoting that the previous things/people are listed, and in this case the character“等”does not actually carry the meaning that there&#8217;s more to be listed.<br />
see examples as follows:</p>
<p>(3) 列举后煞尾 [etc.]</p>
<p>如：与樊哙夏候婴靳强纪信等四人持剑盾步走《史记·项羽本纪》<br />
又如:长江、黄河、黑龙江、珠江等四大河流<br />
&#8230;.. see <a href="http://www.zdic.net/zd/" rel="nofollow">http://www.zdic.net/zd/</a></p>
<p>So, I believe a Chinese author may use a sentence like: &#8220;包括a、b、c、d等&#8221;， and if a translator is unfamiliar with the above usage I quoted, he/she may directly translate it into &#8220;including a, b, c, d, etc.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shannon</title>
		<link>http://www.angryeditor.com/2009/12/15/including/comment-page-1/#comment-225</link>
		<dc:creator>Shannon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 14:47:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.angryeditor.com/?p=262#comment-225</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;#commentbody-223&quot;&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-223&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Chery&lt;/a&gt; :&lt;/strong&gt;Mu husband is an editor, and he hates it so much when Chinese authors use “etc”, especially in a lot of cases where the list is already complete and they just have to add an “etc” as if there is more. More what? Even the authors have no clue.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

totally understood and I felt the same way when I was little younger reading so many 等等 in Chinese.  there seems no rules for when to use 等等。people just don&#039;t care if there&#039;s more things in the list. sometimes, i guess it&#039;s because the author is not very sure if the list is complete.

but when it comes to english, i guess it needs more logic and confidence to remove the &quot;etc.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="#commentbody-223"><p>
<strong><a href="#comment-223" rel="nofollow">Chery</a> :</strong>Mu husband is an editor, and he hates it so much when Chinese authors use “etc”, especially in a lot of cases where the list is already complete and they just have to add an “etc” as if there is more. More what? Even the authors have no clue.</p></blockquote>
<p>totally understood and I felt the same way when I was little younger reading so many 等等 in Chinese.  there seems no rules for when to use 等等。people just don&#8217;t care if there&#8217;s more things in the list. sometimes, i guess it&#8217;s because the author is not very sure if the list is complete.</p>
<p>but when it comes to english, i guess it needs more logic and confidence to remove the &#8220;etc.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chery</title>
		<link>http://www.angryeditor.com/2009/12/15/including/comment-page-1/#comment-223</link>
		<dc:creator>Chery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 07:39:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.angryeditor.com/?p=262#comment-223</guid>
		<description>Mu husband is an editor, and he hates it so much when Chinese authors use &quot;etc&quot;, especially in a lot of cases where the list is already complete and they just have to add an &quot;etc&quot; as if there is more. More what? Even the authors have no clue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mu husband is an editor, and he hates it so much when Chinese authors use &#8220;etc&#8221;, especially in a lot of cases where the list is already complete and they just have to add an &#8220;etc&#8221; as if there is more. More what? Even the authors have no clue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angry Editor</title>
		<link>http://www.angryeditor.com/2009/12/15/including/comment-page-1/#comment-222</link>
		<dc:creator>Angry Editor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 03:47:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.angryeditor.com/?p=262#comment-222</guid>
		<description>谢谢！我工作忙完就回答你们！好像，这个博文要有sequel...

豆瓣里的讨论很强烈，一定可以学习。

http://www.douban.com/group/topic/9060198/

自己也有小组：http://www.douban.com/group/angryeditor/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>谢谢！我工作忙完就回答你们！好像，这个博文要有sequel&#8230;</p>
<p>豆瓣里的讨论很强烈，一定可以学习。</p>
<p><a href="http://www.douban.com/group/topic/9060198/" rel="nofollow">http://www.douban.com/group/topic/9060198/</a></p>
<p>自己也有小组：http://www.douban.com/group/angryeditor/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vanessa</title>
		<link>http://www.angryeditor.com/2009/12/15/including/comment-page-1/#comment-221</link>
		<dc:creator>vanessa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 19:24:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.angryeditor.com/?p=262#comment-221</guid>
		<description>经常such as和etc.混用的某人痛心疾首的路过....

那etc.在什么情况下使用才正确? 请Angry Editor帮忙举几个例子...thx^^</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>经常such as和etc.混用的某人痛心疾首的路过&#8230;.</p>
<p>那etc.在什么情况下使用才正确? 请Angry Editor帮忙举几个例子&#8230;thx^^</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lachris</title>
		<link>http://www.angryeditor.com/2009/12/15/including/comment-page-1/#comment-220</link>
		<dc:creator>lachris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 17:46:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.angryeditor.com/?p=262#comment-220</guid>
		<description>我的理解是include一定要把包含的内容全部写出来，但是加上etc.就可以只写一两个。

e.g. 
including red, black and white - 就只包含三种颜色
including red, black and white etc. - 除了这三种颜色意外还包含其他的颜色

不知道这种理解对不对。希望Angry Editor能解答一下 :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>我的理解是include一定要把包含的内容全部写出来，但是加上etc.就可以只写一两个。</p>
<p>e.g.<br />
including red, black and white &#8211; 就只包含三种颜色<br />
including red, black and white etc. &#8211; 除了这三种颜色意外还包含其他的颜色</p>
<p>不知道这种理解对不对。希望Angry Editor能解答一下 <img src='http://www.angryeditor.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angry Editor</title>
		<link>http://www.angryeditor.com/2009/12/15/including/comment-page-1/#comment-219</link>
		<dc:creator>Angry Editor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 14:19:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.angryeditor.com/?p=262#comment-219</guid>
		<description>好像这个没有广泛使用的规矩，都可以。我比较喜欢我的写法！谢谢！</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>好像这个没有广泛使用的规矩，都可以。我比较喜欢我的写法！谢谢！</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mora</title>
		<link>http://www.angryeditor.com/2009/12/15/including/comment-page-1/#comment-218</link>
		<dc:creator>Mora</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 14:16:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.angryeditor.com/?p=262#comment-218</guid>
		<description>这个我以前都不知道。谢谢！！</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>这个我以前都不知道。谢谢！！</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.angryeditor.com/2009/12/15/including/comment-page-1/#comment-216</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 13:56:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.angryeditor.com/?p=262#comment-216</guid>
		<description>&quot;different people, including students&quot; 之间不应该有这个逗号吧</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;different people, including students&#8221; 之间不应该有这个逗号吧</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
